New Enforcement Law (2): Enforcement Disputes and Objections to Enforcement Procedures

Chapter Five of the new Enforcement Law governs enforcement disputes and objections to enforcement procedures: who may file them, the competent authority, the time limits, and whether they suspend enforcement.

As part of the general overview series on the provisions of the New Enforcement Law, Chapter Five, entitled "Enforcement Disputes and Objections to Enforcement Procedures," is of particular practical significance. It addresses situations in which disputes may arise concerning the validity of an enforcement instrument, the conditions for its enforcement, the court's jurisdiction, or the validity of certain orders, decisions, and procedures taken in the course of enforcement.

The importance of this chapter also lies in the fact that its protection is not limited to the parties to enforcement proceedings, but extends to any interested person who may be affected by such proceedings. It further clarifies when decisions are final, when objections may be submitted, and the effect of such objections on the continuation or suspension of enforcement.

As a General Rule, Court Orders and Decisions Are Final

The Law begins with an important principle: court orders and decisions are final unless otherwise provided by the Law. This reflects an approach aimed at ensuring speed and finality in enforcement proceedings, given that enforcement is, by its nature, intended to secure satisfaction of the right without unnecessary delay.

Article 44 provides as follows:

Except as otherwise specified by the Law, all court orders and decisions shall be final.

What Is an Enforcement Dispute?

An enforcement dispute is not merely a general objection. Rather, it is a legal mechanism that may be invoked where a dispute concerns any of the following:

• the validity of the enforcement instrument;
• the conditions for enforcing the enforcement instrument; or
• the court's jurisdiction to enforce it.

The significance of this framework lies in defining the matters that may form the subject of an enforcement dispute, identifying the competent court, and regulating the nature of the judgments issued in such disputes and the extent to which they may be appealed or challenged before the Supreme Court.

Article 45 provides as follows:

1. Without prejudice to paragraph (2) of Article 4 of the Law, any interested person, whether a party to the enforcement proceedings or otherwise, may file an enforcement dispute concerning the validity of the enforcement instrument, the conditions for its enforcement, or the court's jurisdiction to enforce it.

2. The court shall adjudicate an enforcement dispute in accordance with the provisions governing urgent proceedings and the procedures specified by the Regulations.

3. The Council shall determine the enforcement disputes in which the judgments issued may not be appealed.

4. Judgments issued by the appellate circuits in enforcement disputes that are subject to appeal shall not be subject to challenge by way of cassation.

5. As an exception to paragraph (4) of this Article, the Council may determine the enforcement disputes in which judgments may be challenged by way of cassation.

What Can Be Understood from This Article?

• Standing to file an enforcement dispute is not limited to the parties to the enforcement proceedings; it extends to any person having an interest.
• An enforcement dispute is confined to specific matters and is not an open-ended means of challenging every step taken during enforcement.
• Such disputes are adjudicated in accordance with the rules governing urgent proceedings, which is consistent with the particular nature of enforcement disputes.

Objection to Orders and Decisions Relating to Enforcement Procedures

While an enforcement dispute concerns the validity of the enforcement instrument, the conditions for its enforcement, or the court's jurisdiction, an objection is directed at the orders and decisions relating to the enforcement procedures themselves, insofar as they fall within the categories specified by the Regulations.

In this respect, the Law addresses several matters of practical importance, including:

• who is entitled to submit an objection;
• the authority competent to consider it;
• the statutory time limit for submitting the objection; and
• the possibility of suspending the implementation of the challenged order or decision where the relevant interest so requires.

Article 46 provides as follows:

1. Any interested person may object to orders and decisions relating to enforcement procedures, as specified by the Regulations, issued by the court, the competent administration, or the private sector.

2. The objection shall be submitted to and decided by the President of the Court or such person as designated by the Council within ten (10) business days from the day following the date on which access to the decision or order is made available, in accordance with the Regulations. The President of the Court, or the person designated by the Council, as the case may be, may suspend the implementation of the challenged order or decision where the relevant interest so requires until the objection is determined. Such suspension shall result in the suspension of all procedures and time limits related thereto.

3. In all cases, the decision issued in respect of the objection referred to in this Article shall be final.

Does an Enforcement Dispute or Objection Automatically Suspend Enforcement?

This is one of the most important issues from a practical perspective. It may be assumed that merely filing an enforcement dispute, the existence of a dispute concerning the underlying right embodied in the enforcement instrument, or submitting an objection to an enforcement procedure automatically suspends enforcement.

The Law, however, expressly resolves this issue by establishing that enforcement proceedings shall, as a general rule, continue, unless the authority competent to consider the dispute or objection decides otherwise.

This reflects a clear legislative approach aimed at preventing enforcement from being delayed merely by raising a dispute or filing an objection, while preserving the competent authority's power to suspend the proceedings where justified.

Article 47 provides as follows:

1. The existence of an enforcement dispute, a dispute concerning the underlying right embodied in the enforcement instrument, or an objection to any enforcement procedure shall not prevent the continuation of enforcement proceedings in accordance with the Law and the Regulations, unless the authority competent to consider the dispute or objection decides otherwise.

2. The suspension of enforcement proceedings shall result in the suspension of all related procedures and time limits.

Legal disclaimer: The information published on the website and social media platforms of Eyad Reda Law Firm LLP ("the Firm") is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion. Use of this information does not create a lawyer–client relationship. While the Firm strives to ensure the accuracy of the content, it accepts no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on it. Users are advised to obtain specialised legal advice by submitting a formal request through the Firm's approved communication channels.

All publications